Tag Archives: DO

Dominant position

Dominant position

Dominant position in the European Union Law

Concept of Dominant position provided by the “Glossary of terms used in EU competition policy” (Antitrust and control of concentrations, published in 2002): A firm is in a dominant position if it has the ability to behave inde-pendently of its competitors, customers, suppliers and, ultimately, the final consumer. A dominant firm holding such market power would have the ability to set prices above the competitive level, to sell products of an inferior quality or to reduce its rate of innovation below the level that would exist in a competitive market. Under EU competition law, it is not illegal to hold a dominant position, since a dominant position can be obtained by legitimate means of competi-tion, for example, by inventing and selling a better product. Instead, competition rules do not allow companies to () abuse their dominant position. The European merger control system ( Merger control procedure) differs from this principle, in so far as it prohibits merged entities from obtaining or strengthening a dominant position by way of the merger.

A dominant position may also be enjoyed jointly by two or more independent economic entities united by economic links in a specific market. This situation is called collective (or joint or oligopolistic) dominance. As the Court has ruled in the Gencor judgment, there is no reason, in legal or economic terms, to exclude from the notion of economic links the relationship of interdependence existing between the parties to a tight oligopoly within which those parties are in a position to anticipate each one another's behaviour and are therefore strongly encouraged to align their conduct in the market.

(See: Article 82 of the EC Treaty and Article 2(3) of the merger regulation; on collective dominance see also: Commission Decision No 97/26/EC of 24.4.1996 in Case IV/M.619 Gencor/Lonrho (OJ L 11, 14.1.1997, p. 30) and judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25.3.1999 in Case T-102/96 Gencor Ltd v Commission [1999] ECR, p. II-0753.)

Resources

See also

  • Collusion
  • Oligopoly

Downstream market

Downstream market

Downstream market in the European Union Law

Concept of Downstream market provided by the “Glossary of terms used in EU competition policy” (Antitrust and control of concentrations, published in 2002): Market at the next stage of the production/distribution chain, for example, the distribution and sale of motor vehicles would be a downstream market in relation to the production of motor vehicles.

Documents emanating from a different case file

Documents emanating from a different case file

Documents emanating from a different case file

According to Article 28 (1) Regulation 1/2003, the information collected may be used only for the purpose for which it was acquired.

More about Documents emanating from a different case file

Investigations which are conducted on different markets or against different companies and which are not related (i.e. investigations into distinct infringements) lead normally to different case files set up under distinct case numbers.

More about the Subject

For extending the use of information for another purpose than for which it was originally acquired, the case-team may ask the provider of information for supplying the information for this other identified purpose.

Other Considerations

Companies concerned by an investigation may sometimes request access to information acquired in the course of a different investigation. Access is however denied if a document has no relevance for an addressee of the Statement of Objections because it is objectively unrelated to the objections addressed to it. 1

Resources

See Also

References

  • Information about Documents emanating from a different case file in the Antitrust Manual of Procedures for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (Internal DG Competition)

Notes


[Note 1]
Joined cases C-204/00 P e.a., Aalborg Portland e.a. [2004] ECR I-123, para. 126-128

Further Reading

  • Information about Documents emanating from a different case file in “An Introduction to EU Competition Law”, Moritz Lorenz (Cambridge University Press)

Documents in the file

Documents in the file

Documents to put in the file

The preparation for access to file entails the following: – Documents that upon examination are not objectively linked to the investigation or do not respond to the question asked in a request for information can be returned (see paragraph (13) above). This should be done without undue delay 1 . The decision whether to return such documents is within the full discretion of the Commission (i.e. no standing of an information provider to request the returning of documents). – Multiple versions of the identical document sent by e-mail, fax, normal mail, etc. are uploaded by the Registry into the case file and may be deleted by the case team only if they are identical. These documents are deleted with the following reason for deletion “duplicate of IDxxx”. As a matter of principle, data entries and scanning carried out by the Registry should be checked on a continuous basis by the Registry and the case team. Multiple non-finalised, non-confidential versions of the same document should be avoided. Keep only the final version as accessible and mark the previous versions as non-accessible. – Non-confidential versions have to be systematically requested from the information providers and put in the file (see above section 2.4.1 Informing companies how to lodge confidentiality requests).

Resources

See Also

References

  • Information about Documents in the file in the Antitrust Manual of Procedures for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (Internal DG Competition)

Notes


[Note 1]
Even if information appears to be not relevant at a later stage, there should be possibilities to return the documents, to be assessed on a case by case basis and in close co-operation with the Hearing Officers.

Further Reading

  • Information about Documents in the file in “An Introduction to EU Competition Law”, Moritz Lorenz (Cambridge University Press)