Tag Archives: EX

Extra-territoriality

Extra-territoriality

Extra-territoriality in the European Union Law

Concept of Extra-territoriality provided by the “Glossary of terms used in EU competition policy” (Antitrust and control of concentrations, published in 2002): Term normally used to describe the exercise by a sovereign State of jurisdiction over foreigners in respect of acts done outside the borders of that State. One could say that — in a very broad sense — the EU applies its competition rules in an extra-territorial manner when it makes use of the () effects doctrine.

Exclusive distribution

Exclusive distribution

Exclusive distribution in the European Union Law

Concept of Exclusive distribution provided by the “Glossary of terms used in EU competition policy” (Antitrust and control of concentrations, published in 2002): A distribution system, in which a company grants exclusive rights on its products or services to another company. The most common forms include () single branding and/or exclusive territory rights, whereby a single distributor obtains the right to market a supplier's product in a specific territory. The supplier's purpose in granting exclusivity is normally to provide the distributor with incentives to promote the product and provide better service to customers. In most cases, the distributor's market power is limited by () inter-brand competition.

Exhaustion

Exhaustion

Exhaustion in the European Union Law

Concept of Exhaustion provided by the “Glossary of terms used in EU competition policy” (Antitrust and control of concentrations, published in 2002): Intellectual property rights (IPRs) such as patents and trademarks give the developer certain exclusive rights over the exploitation of his work, such as in production and commerce. However, within the EU, the exclusive right cannot be used to artificially split up the common market along national borders. Therefore, the holder of an IPR in a Member State cannot oppose the import of a product protected by the IPR into that Member State, where that product was already put on the market in another Member State by the holder or with his consent. To this extent the holder's IPR is considered to be exhausted. The principle of exhaustion does not apply with regard to products put on the market in third countries.

Resources

See also

  • Intellectual property right

Exclusionary practice

Exclusionary practice

Exclusionary practice in the European Union Law

Concept of Exclusionary practice provided by the “Glossary of terms used in EU competition policy” (Antitrust and control of concentrations, published in 2002): Practice by a dominant company that tends to impair the opportuni-ties of competitors based on considerations other than competition on the merits. An example would be the decision, by a company dominant on the market for production of a certain product, not to supply a client, because he is a competitor active in the market for distribution of this product.

Ex Officio Action

Ex Officio Action

Interim Measures: Ex Officio Action

Article 8(1) of Regulation 1/2003 explicitly confirms that the Commission may issue an interim order 'acting on its own initiative'.

More about Ex Officio Action

While it can be expected that undertakings being harmed by anti-competitive conduct will request the Commission to impose interim orders, Regulation 1/2003 does not formally acknowledge undertakings' right to make such requests. Complainants or third parties who can demonstrate sufficient interest to be heard may encourage the Commission to adopt such measures. However, under Article 8(1) of Regulation 1/2003, the Commission acts ex officio. This means that complainants do not have a right to ask for interim measures under Regulation 1/2003, and the Commission is therefore no longer 1 obliged to decide on any (informal) request for interim measures and, if necessary, to reject it by decision. However, the Commission's decision to adopt interim measures is subject to appeal before the EU Courts.

More about the Subject

Complainants can on the other hand seek interim measures before national courts 2 pursuant to national procedural rules.

Resources

See Also

References

  • Information about Ex Officio Action in the Antitrust Manual of Procedures for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (Internal DG Competition)

Notes


[Note 1]
Under Regulation No. 17, according to the case law parties had a right to request interim measures, and the Commission was obliged to adopt a formal appealable decision on such a request.
[Note 2]
See paragraph 16 of the Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty (2004/C 101/05).

Further Reading

  • Information about Ex Officio Action in “An Introduction to EU Competition Law”, Moritz Lorenz (Cambridge University Press)