Tag Archives: Procedures for Cooperation

Procedures for cooperation with third countries

Procedures for cooperation with third countries

Principles and procedures for cooperation with other third countries

The following guidelines for the implementation of international agreements need to be respected when assessing a case which has an international dimension:

Resources

See Also

References

  • Information about Procedures for cooperation with third countries in the Antitrust Manual of Procedures for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (Internal DG Competition)

Further Reading

  • Information about Procedures for cooperation with third countries in EU Competition Procedure, 3rd. Edition, Edited by Luis Ortiz Blanco (Oxford University Press)

Notification from third countries

Notification from third countries

Notification from third countries

When a notification is received from the authorities of a third country, Unit A5 shall forward it to the operational units concerned and to the Member States whose interests are affected.

Resources

See Also

References

  • Information about Notification from third countries in the Antitrust Manual of Procedures for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (Internal DG Competition)

Further Reading

  • Information about Notification from third countries in EU Competition Procedure, 3rd. Edition, Edited by Luis Ortiz Blanco (Oxford University Press)

Notification to third countries

Notification to third countries

Notification to third countries

A case officer should determine whether a third country, with which the EU has concluded an agreement has an interest in a case for which he/she is responsible. The case officer should consider whether any of the following criteria is met:

More about Notification to third countries

– in making an initial assessment of a case:

More about the Subject

Is the case officer aware of a similar enquiry taking place in the third country? – Does the case involve anti-competitive activities (other than a merger or acquisition) carried out in significant part on the territory of the third country? – Is one or more of the undertakings under investigation or party to the transaction, or a company controlling such undertaking(s), a company incorporated or organised under the laws of the third country? – Does the case involve conduct believed to have been required, encouraged or approved by the third country? or

Other Considerations

– during the course of the investigation: – Will DG Competition request information from any undertaking on the territory of the third country? – Will the enforcement activity involve remedies that would, in significant respects, require or prohibit condu

More

Where a case meets any of the above criteria, the case officer should verify if notification to the third country is obligatory and should inform Unit A5/International Relations. The relevant desk officer in Unit A5 will be available to provide assistance and advice.

More

In particular, Unit A5 should be informed in each of the following circumstances: a) before a statement of objections is issued; b) before a decision or a settlement (remedies) is adopted; c) in case the Commission intervenes in judicial proceedings in third countries (amicus curiae etc.)

More

Unit A5 is available to provide guidance if required.

Resources

See Also

References

  • Information about Notification to third countries in the Antitrust Manual of Procedures for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (Internal DG Competition)

Further Reading

  • Information about Notification to third countries in EU Competition Procedure, 3rd. Edition, Edited by Luis Ortiz Blanco (Oxford University Press)

Positive Comity Requests

Positive Comity Requests

Positive Comity Requests

Positive comity enables one side adversely affected by anti-competitive conduct carried out in the other's territory, to request the other side's competition authority to take enforcement action. There are general “positive comity” provisions in the Cooperation Agreements with the US (Article V 2), Canada (Article V 2), Japan (Article 5.1) and Korea (Article 6) according to which either Party can invite the other Party to take, on the basis of the latter's legislation, appropriate measures regarding anti-competitive behaviour implemented on its territory and which affects the important interests of the requesting Party.

More about Positive Comity Requests

With regard to the US a special Positive Comity Agreement has existed since 1998. The Agreement clarifies both the mechanics of the positive comity co-operation instrument, and the circumstances in which it can be availed of. In principle, one party may request the other party to remedy anticompetitive behaviour which originates in its jurisdiction but affects the requesting party as well. The Commissioner for Competition has delegated powers to make a request under this agreement to the US or to respond to one from the US (Commission decision of 19 June, adopting SEC (2002)669).

More about the Subject

In practice, the positive comity provisions are not used frequently as companies (i.e. complainants) prefer to address directly the competition authority they consider to be best suited to deal with the situation. If, however, a case of positive comity arises, the case handler should contact UnitA5 to determine the appropriate course of action.

Resources

See Also

References

  • Information about Positive Comity Requests in the Antitrust Manual of Procedures for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (Internal DG Competition)

Further Reading

  • Information about Positive Comity Requests in EU Competition Procedure, 3rd. Edition, Edited by Luis Ortiz Blanco (Oxford University Press)

Cooperation with Third Parties

Cooperation with Third Parties

Cooperation and coordination

If a case officer wishes to contact the authorities of a third country (request for assistance, material or clarification about a parallel investigation etc.), he/she can ask Unit A5 to arrange the initial contact.

More about Cooperation with Third Parties

If an authority of a third country requests assistance from DG Competition, Unit A5 will inform the operational unit concerned, and will facilitate the contacts with the third country authority.

More about the Subject

Where, an operational Directorate believes that there are important EU interests which would necessitate an intervention by DG Competition with the authorities of the third country, – to take action, – to modify a proposed action, or

Other Considerations

to desist from taking action it should immediately consult with Unit A5 to determine the most appropriate course of action. Likewise, where a third country requests DG Competition in a specific case – to take action, – to modify a proposed action, or – to desist from taking action based on the important interests of the third country, Unit A5 should immediately contact the operational Directorate concerned to determine the appropriate course of action.

Resources

See Also

References

  • Information about Cooperation with Third Parties in the Antitrust Manual of Procedures for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (Internal DG Competition)

Further Reading

  • Information about Cooperation with Third Parties in EU Competition Procedure, 3rd. Edition, Edited by Luis Ortiz Blanco (Oxford University Press)