Tag Archives: Publication in the OJ

Summary of the decision

Summary of the decision

Summary of the decision

Pursuant to Article 30(2) Reg. 1/2003, the publication in the OJ shall state the – names of the parties, – main content of the decision, – including any penalties imposed.

More about Summary of the decision

These elements therefore have to be contained in the published summary of the decision.

More about the Subject

The summary is often based on the Communication to the College or the summary prepared for the Advisory Committee.

Other Considerations

In order to make clear that the summary of the decision is not a decision itself, the heading should read “Summary of the Commission's decision”.

Resources

See Also

References

  • Information about Summary of the decision in the Antitrust Manual of Procedures for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (Internal DG Competition)

Further Reading

  • Information about Summary of the decision in EU Competition Procedure, 3rd. Edition, Edited by Luis Ortiz Blanco (Oxford University Press)

Hearing Officer Final Report

Hearing Officer Final report

Hearing Officer

Final Report of the Hearing Officer

The final report is published in the form the Hearing Officer has established it.

Resources

See Also

References

  • Information about Hearing Officer Final Report in the Antitrust Manual of Procedures for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (Internal DG Competition)

Further Reading

  • Information about Hearing Officer Final Report in EU Competition Procedure, 3rd. Edition, Edited by Luis Ortiz Blanco (Oxford University Press)

Advisory Committee Opinion

Advisory Committee opinion

Follow-up of the Advisory Committee's opinion if changes required

Pursuant to Article 14(5) of Regulation No 1/2003, “the Commission shall take the utmost account of the opinion of the Advisory Committee” and “inform the Committee of the manner in which its opinion has been taken into account”.

More about Advisory Committee opinion

In case the decision is revised following the opinion of the Advisory Committee, the new version should promptly be transmitted to the Member States.

More about the Subject

If the draft decision is substantially amended, the Legal Service must be consulted on these changes.

Resources

See Also

References

  • Information about Advisory Committee opinion in the Antitrust Manual of Procedures for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (Internal DG Competition)

Further Reading

  • Information about Advisory Committee opinion in EU Competition Procedure, 3rd. Edition, Edited by Luis Ortiz Blanco (Oxford University Press)

Opinion of the Advisory Committee

The opinion of the Advisory Committee is published in the form it has been established, but without the signatures.

Resources

See Also

References

  • Information about Advisory Committee Opinion in the Antitrust Manual of Procedures for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (Internal DG Competition)

Further Reading

  • Information about Advisory Committee Opinion in EU Competition Procedure, 3rd. Edition, Edited by Luis Ortiz Blanco (Oxford University Press)