Tag Archives: SP

Specialisation Agreement

Specialisation Agreement

Specialisation agreement in the European Union Law

Concept of Specialisation agreement provided by the “Glossary of terms used in EU competition policy” (Antitrust and control of concentrations, published in 2002): An agreement between undertakings relating to the conditions under which they specialise in the production of a narrow or specific range of goods and/or services. Agreements on specialisation can contribute to improving the production or distribution of goods, because the undertakings concerned can concentrate on the manu-facture of certain products and thus operate more efficiently and supply the products more cheaply. Specialisation agreements are divided into agreements whereby one participant gives up the manu-facture of certain products, or provision of certain services in favour of another participant (unilateral specialisation); agreements whereby each participant gives up the manufacture of certain products, or provision of certain services in favour of another participant (recipro-cal specialisation); and agreements whereby the participants under-take jointly to manufacture certain products, or provide certain services (joint production). The issue is covered by a specific block exemption regulation.

(See: Council Regulation (EC) No 2658/2000 of 29 November 2000 on the appli-cation of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of specialisation agreements (OJ L 304, 5.12.2000).)

Spillover effects

Spillover effects

Spillover effects in the European Union Law

Concept of Spillover effects provided by the “Glossary of terms used in EU competition policy” (Antitrust and control of concentrations, published in 2002): Side effects of an agreement or a merger between two or several firms, which affect competition between them in another relevant market than the one covered by the agreement or the merger in question. Spillover effects are referred to in Article 2(4) of the merger regulation, which concerns the creation of a joint venture that has as its object or effect the coordination of the competitive behaviour of undertakings that remain independent. In that case, the Commission shall appraise this coordination also taking into account whether two or more parent companies retain, to a significant extent, activities in a market which is () downstream or () upstream from that of the joint venture or in a neighbouring market closely related to this market.

Specific confidentiality safeguards

Specific confidentiality safeguards

Specific confidentiality safeguards

In exceptional cases where a risk exists that a Member State competition authority could not guarantee that commercially sensitive information is not used by another “arm of the State” for purposes other than the enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, the Commission would need to take the necessary safeguarding measures respecting the ruling of the Court in the SEP case 1 . If it wishes to transmit a document to the competent national authorities, notwithstanding the claim that in the particular circumstances of the case that document is of a confidential nature with respect to those authorities, the Commission will have to adopt a reasoned decision amenable to judicial review by means of an action for annulment. It is through an action for the annulment of such a decision that the undertaking might effectively rely on its right to protection of its business secrets.

More about Specific confidentiality safeguards

In those cases where the Commission has decided which information is to be treated confidentially – as the case could be with respect to requests for public access to documents under Regulation 1049/2001 or with respect to questions decided by the Hearing officer in the application of the Akzo procedure (very exceptionally, in the application of the SEP case law mentioned in previous paragraph) – the transmission should indicate which parts of the exchanged information are thus regarded as confidential.

More about the Subject

Where the parties have provided a non-confidential version of the information, it is recommended to also include this version in the transmission pursuant to Article 12.

Resources

See Also

References

  • Information about Specific confidentiality safeguards in the Antitrust Manual of Procedures for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (Internal DG Competition)

Further Reading

  • Information about Specific confidentiality safeguards in EU Competition Procedure, 3rd. Edition, Edited by Luis Ortiz Blanco (Oxford University Press)