{"id":162,"date":"2014-10-08T18:49:33","date_gmt":"2014-10-08T18:49:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu?p=162"},"modified":"2014-10-08T18:49:33","modified_gmt":"2014-10-08T18:49:33","slug":"esa-competence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/2014\/10\/08\/esa-competence\/","title":{"rendered":"ESA Competence"},"content":{"rendered":"
If a case needs to be transmitted to ESA for reasons of competence, a corresponding decision must be taken by the Commissioner, who has received an empowerment to this effect (Commission's decision of 6 April 1994, PV (1196) adopting SEC (94) 571, point 1.b). Once this decision is taken, the documents are sent to ESA, and Member States and undertakings concerned are informed hereof – as well as further comments on the case. The Commission will continue to be associated with further proceedings undertaken by ESA.<\/p>\n
Such transmission of cases should take place as early as feasible in the course of proceedings. It cannot take place after the sending of a statement of objections or of the letter informing an applicant that there are insufficient grounds for pursuing his complaint. Once a case has been transmitted for reasons of competence, a retransmission may no longer take place.<\/p>\n
It is conceivable that the ESA and the Commission disagree on the attribution of a case. If a solution cannot be found at working level, the issue must be brought before the Joint Committee of the EEA Agreement (for further contact Unit A 5\/International Relations).<\/p>\n
If a case needs to be transmitted to ESA for reasons of competence, a corresponding decision must be taken by the Commissioner, who has received an empowerment to this effect (Commission's decision of 6 April 1994, PV (1196) adopting SEC (94) 571, point 1.b). Once this dec…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2389,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[107],"tags":[64,65,66,111,67],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2389"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=162"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=162"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=162"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=162"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}