{"id":309,"date":"2014-10-08T18:49:35","date_gmt":"2014-10-08T18:49:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu?p=309"},"modified":"2014-10-08T18:49:35","modified_gmt":"2014-10-08T18:49:35","slug":"preliminary-draft-decision-motivation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/2014\/10\/08\/preliminary-draft-decision-motivation\/","title":{"rendered":"Preliminary Draft Decision Motivation"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Preliminary Draft Decision Motivation<\/h1>\n<h2>Preparation of the preliminary draft Article 10 Decision: Motivation of a decision<\/h2>\n<p>According to Article 296 TFEU, Commission decisions must state the reasons on which they are based. Failure to give reasons for a decision can be sanctioned on the basis of Article 263 TFEU and could entail the annulment of the decision by the General Court.<\/p>\n<h3>More about Preliminary Draft Decision Motivation<\/h3>\n<p>In its statement of reasons, the decision should take into account, when appropriate, relevant third parties&#039; arguments submitted following the publication of the Article 27(4) Notice.<\/p>\n<h2>Resources<\/h2>\n<h3>See Also<\/h3>\n<h3>References<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Information about Preliminary Draft Decision Motivation in the Antitrust Manual of Procedures for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (Internal DG Competition)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Further Reading<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Information about Preliminary Draft Decision Motivation in EU Competition Procedure, 3rd. Edition, Edited by Luis Ortiz Blanco (Oxford University Press)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<h2>Preparation of the preliminary draft Article 10 Decision: Motivation of a decision<\/h2>\n<p>According to Article 296 TFEU, Commission decisions must state the reasons on which they are based. Failure to give reasons for a decision can be sanctioned on the basis of Article 263 TFEU and could entail th&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2389,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[151],"tags":[30,158,92,159],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2389"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=309"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}