{"id":378,"date":"2014-10-08T18:49:36","date_gmt":"2014-10-08T18:49:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu?p=378"},"modified":"2014-10-08T18:49:36","modified_gmt":"2014-10-08T18:49:36","slug":"request-for-deadline-extension","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/2014\/10\/08\/request-for-deadline-extension\/","title":{"rendered":"Request for deadline extension"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Request for deadline extension<\/h1>\n<h2>Identifying information that may not be published: Request for deadline extension<\/h2>\n<p>In case of a request for an extension of the deadline: &#8211; Such a request must be in writing (e-mail is sufficient). &#8211; The request must be reasoned to allow for its appropriate assessment by the case team. &#8211; In general, the need to prepare, at the same time, for a procedure before the Court (appeal, preparation for a hearing) is not an acceptable reason for an extension, since this applies to all parties. &#8211; In general, a justified extension should not exceed one week, however, account should be taken of the length of the decision, which in certain circumstances may justify a longer extension. &#8211; The reply to the extension request should be in writing (e-mail by the case team is sufficient).<\/p>\n<h2>Resources<\/h2>\n<h3>See Also<\/h3>\n<h3>References<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Information about Request for deadline extension in the Antitrust Manual of Procedures for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (Internal DG Competition)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Further Reading<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Information about Request for deadline extension in EU Competition Procedure, 3rd. Edition, Edited by Luis Ortiz Blanco (Oxford University Press)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<h2>Identifying information that may not be published: Request for deadline extension<\/h2>\n<p>In case of a request for an extension of the deadline: &#8211; Such a request must be in writing (e-mail is sufficient). &#8211; The request must be reasoned to allow for its appropriate assessment by the case team. &#8211; In g&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2389,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[164],"tags":[68,69,79],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/378"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2389"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=378"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/378\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=378"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=378"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/competition.lawlegal.eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=378"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}